What one thinking "what is right" keep changing from time to time and place to place, and it is the only prevailing sense of morality which can help anyone to choose how to act by choosing "lesser but better" right, as per the demand of time and circumstances, and this helps --one to be right and to be moralistic at the same time, so a sense of morality far more important than, to choose " just what is right "
Anyone can understand it by oneself just by thinking on that - what was right for him at the 10 years of age, is not right for him at the age of 25 years, under changed circumstances and consequences, - this simply means -- right -for anyone, is used to en changed with the paradigm shift of consequences & sequentiality which means -- what one is thinking - right -- for today will not necessarily right for tomorrow too,
So, now there rises a serious question that how one will be cope in a crisis of identifying what is "most right " and how one will then choose the most right thing, for himself
But now more serious issue start surfacing, as -- Act of righteousness, is not always -- "most right thing " for limited circumstances and with a limited period of time, So one can remain with 2 choices to choose between -- "most right thing " and "Act of righteousness" for given circumstances, as just having a sense of morality doesn't make compulsion for anyone to follow -Act of righteousness for all the time
So here -- there comes --the idea of a sense of Morality, to rescue the situation of crisis to identify " what is right to act upon ", which can help to turn --just right into " Act or righteousness " which will be right for all the time and circumstances,this is how --Righteousness comes into existence,So now here comes the idea of self-sacrifice, against freedom of will.
Please dont forget to subscribe
ReplyDelete